|
 |
Pilot Flexible Air Permit Profile
Source: DaimlerChrysler Corporation
Facility Type:
Automobile Manufacturer
Location: Newark, Delaware
The Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control
(DNREC) worked with DaimlerChrysler to develop a flexible
air permit that enabled the plant to make operational
changes in a streamlined manner. The permit enabled the
plant to compete for production opportunities within the company’s global network of manufacturing operations, including
its selection as the site for future production of the Dodge Durango hybrid
vehicle. By eliminating many potential air permitting delays to making
operational changes, the flexible permit helped the plant to avoid closure,
retaining hundreds of jobs. The flexible permit also ensured that all applicable
regulatory requirements were addressed and facilitated changes made through
the plant’s active pollution prevention program.
DaimlerChrysler’s Newark, Delaware automobile assembly plant received
a flexible New Source Review air permit (Permit No. APC-95/0569) in September
1995, and a flexible title V air operating permit (Permit No. AQM-003/00128)
in October 1999 which incorporated the former permit’s plant-wide
applicability limits (PALs) and other flexibility provisions. The flexible
permit allowed advance approval of specified changes and an expedited,
45-day review process for those changes not explicitly covered. This is
compared with the typical 2-3 years associated with issuing a conventional
title V air permit in Delaware.
Tools & Methods Used in the Pilot Permit
Alternative Operating Scenarios
(AOS) and Advanced Approvals |
Approvals for specified projects and categories of
operational changes, including modifications to or construction of new
vehicles assembly and coating process units and equipment. |
Approved
Replicable Methodologies (ARMs) |
Replicable testing procedure for updating pollution
control device parameters. |
Plantwide emissions caps |
Plant-wide applicability limits (PALs) for NOx (150.71
tons/year; 4.86 tons/day) and VOC (1,112.8 tons/year; 5.3 tons/day). |
Pollution prevention (P2) |
Enforceable P2 performance requirement for topcoat
emissions and P2 reporting requirements. |
Implementation logs |
Log maintained to document changes in use of alternative
operating scenarios. |
Environmental Benefits and Pollution Prevention
- Reduced allowable and actual air emissions. Newark’s plant-wide
emissions caps were set lower than those that would have been required
under conventional permitting. The VOC PAL, based on actual VOC
emissions for 1990, was reduced partly to reflect the effect of industrial
solvent cleaning rules adopted after 1990, to an annual limit of 1112.8
tons per year (tpy). Actual VOC emissions decreased from 1165 tpy
in 1994 to 776 tpy in 2000, despite increases in
production. NOx emissions were similarly reduced
from 174 tpy in 1994 to 61 tpy in 2000.
- Easier P2 implementation. Most emissions reductions
have resulted from pollution prevention activities.
The flexible permit encouraged pollution prevention initiatives, since
the facility had strong incentives to maintain emissions levels well below
the plant-wide limits to assure compliance and to create room for increased
economic growth under the emissions cap. DaimlerChrysler’s P2 efforts include coating
process modifications to reduce VOCs and hazardous
air pollutants (HAPs). The facility predicted that the permit flexibility
will enable the site to test new clearcoat paint applications and material
technology which are expected to further lower VOC emissions.
Economic Competitiveness Benefits
- Agile manufacturing. The Newark facility made over 90 changes in coating
system components, coatings, cleaning activities,
fuel fired sources, source locations, ventilation systems, and emissions
control systems under the flexible permits between 1995 and 2000.
- Job retention and plant competitiveness. The flexible
permitting process was a major factor in DaimlerChrysler’s decision
to invest $325 million and produce the Dodge Durango at the Newark site,
helping to secure approximately 2,900 jobs at the plant. The facility is
planning substantial model styling changes, which will require more agile
equipment to paint contours appropriately. The flexible permit can
allow such changes to proceed without case-by-case permitting delay, provided
that the facility remains below its PALs. Air permitting flexibility
also plays a factor in DaimlerChrysler’s business decisions over
whether to pursue projects in the United States or
in other nations.
Monitoring and Enforceability
- Replicable monitoring and routine reporting. DaimlerChrysler tracked
VOC emissions through mass-balance equations and
EPA’s automotive
protocol, accounting for pollution control equipment
performance. The PAL permits require more frequent reporting (monthly),
providing DNREC with more information on overall facility emissions, changes,
and P2 activities than they receive under conventional permits. The flexible
permit has also brought about automated NOx monitoring at the Newark facility.
Corporate and Government Efficiency
- Compliance burden reduction. According DaimlerChrysler, the permits have
saved approximately 510 staff hours associated with regulatory applicability
assessment and permitting actions, and enabled the facility to remain on
schedule for plant upgrades. The cost of facility downtime was reported
to be as high as $1.8 million per hour, with one Major New Source Review
netting process occupying 400 to 800 staff hours.
- Paperwork and backlog reduction. DNREC officials
indicated that the flexible permits have reduced the time and resources
needed for case-by-case review of construction permitting applications.
Public Response
- Conventional public comment process. The NSR and title V permits each
went out for a standard public comment period, advertised
as unique permits with flexible conditions. No public hearings were requested,
and no public comments were received. Unrelated to the flexible permit,
DaimlerChrysler personnel have worked to evaluate and address ongoing
public interest in the Newark facility due to odor concerns. Response
efforts included reformulating paint recipes and increasing stack heights.
For More Information
Back to Top |